There is a place on the eastern flank of Mount Arjuna where
the ground still keeps secrets. Go there in the dry season, when the grass has
faded to the color of old bone and the air carries a faint smell of char even
when nothing is burning, and you may begin to understand why. The village is
Katiden, in Lawang District, Malang Regency. Buried in its soil—waiting the way
such things wait—were two stone tablets that would eventually claw their way
back into human attention: Katiden I and Katiden II. Names like case files.
Names like entries in a coroner’s report. In a sense that is exactly what they
were: records of the dead, and of the dead’s unfinished business.
The epigrapher who first made coherent sense of them was
Titi Surti Nastiti of the National Archaeological Research Center (Puslit
Arkenas). Her reading recovered a story that seven centuries of rain, root, and
silence had not quite erased. The inscriptions reaffirmed a decree—a promise
made and then remade—issued by a Majapahit official who had died, the record
states with bureaucratic bluntness, at a place called Kertabhuwana. As if death
were an address. As if the man had simply moved.
Some scholars believe they know who that official was. One
of his names—men of that rank collected them the way others collect debts—was
Raden Kudamerta, once a Majapahit envoy sent into Wengker. In the temple
registers he appears again, transfigured, as Bhre Parameswara, ruler of
Pamotan, wearing the consecration name Sri Wijayarajasa. He had a daughter,
Paduka Sori, who married Hayam Wuruk, the greatest king Majapahit would
produce. That marriage made the dead man’s blood royal. It made him father-in-law
to an empire.
The timing aligns with unsettling precision. Bhre
Parameswara held office in the years the Katiden I inscription was cut. L. Ch.
Damais converted the Saka date and arrived at a window: 1314 Saka, between 24
March and 22 April 1392. Nearly six hundred years gone, and still the calendar
can point to it.
A Dutch scholar, W. F. Stutterheim, was the first outsider
to translate the inscription, in 1937. Boechari and Wibowo rendered it into
Indonesian in 1985. Today the stone sits in the National Museum, catalogued
E.65—tagged and numbered like evidence, which is precisely what it is.
Three years later in the old reckoning, the story continued.
Katiden II, dated 1317 Saka (17 July–15 August 1395), supplied the missing
name: Bhatara Sri Parameswara. Poerbatjaraka’s 1936 Dutch translation has the
cadence of a proclamation read at dusk:
It is hereby announced to all the wedana, juru, buyut,
and also the pancatanda of Turen that the order of His Majesty Bhatara Sri
Parameswara, who passed away at Wisnubhawana, has been reaffirmed, as has the
order of His Majesty who passed away at Kertabhuwana, concerning the status of
the inhabitants of Katiden, encompassing eleven villages.
Two dead lords, both still—through the half-life that royal
decrees grant the departed—issuing commands.
Th. G. Th. Pigeaud carried the text into English in 1960, a
single paragraph on page 174 of the third volume of Java in the 14th Century.
Here the record turns stranger. The Katiden II stone itself
is gone. Not misplaced like a set of keys, but gone the way a paper trail
simply ends. Poerbatjaraka once placed it in a Malang museum collection under
the number R.M. 893—yet Malang had no museum in 1936. The citation points to a
building that did not exist. Make of that what you will.
What both stones state without ambiguity is this: take care
of the land.
Katiden I lays down hunting law. The people of Katiden might
spear the plant-eaters and walk away clean; the predators were to be left
alone. A boundary drawn not around the village but around the food chain, as
though someone six centuries ago already understood what happens to a forest
when the wrong link is removed.
Katiden II addresses the pancatanda who governed Turen and
the villages east of Mount Kawi. Eleven settlements are named and bound
together. The decree is not a whip but a reward. The people of Katiden had
guarded the alang-alang—the wild grass and scrub of Mount Lejar—against
the fire that dry mountainsides always threaten. For that service the crown
excused them from the jalang tax, the palawang house tax, the taker
turun, the tahil, and every form of titisara tribute the
kingdom could invent.
The reverse side continues with the flat finality of a
decree meant to last:
Regarding the forest of gaten trees and turtle eggs, no
one may forbid them, on the grounds that they are not forbidden. No one may
deceive them in any matter. Such is my royal seal; once it has been read aloud,
it shall be kept by the village of Lumpang.
(That translation is the work of Anisa Musyafol Ikhrom, Deny
Yudo Wahyudi, and Daya Negri Wijaya of Universitas Negeri Malang.) There is
something almost tender in it: a king six centuries dead still insisting that
no one lie to his people about the turtle eggs.
Alang-alang is more than grass; the word carries the
weight of forest. For an unknown span of years the people of Katiden held the
line against what that dry grass wanted to become each time the rains failed.
They kept the fires small.
The place has other names now. Mount Lejar is Mount Mujur, a
lesser summit against Arjuna’s flank; its old name survives, ghostlike, in the
village of Nglajar northeast of Batu. The forest there still burns. Katiden
itself is believed to have become Ketindan, in the saddle between Kawi and
Arjuno. The fires still arrive every dry season, as if something promised a
meal seven hundred years ago has never forgotten the appointment.
There is more than stone. A Dwarapala statue turned up, one
of those squat guardian figures kingdoms leave as notices meant for spirits
rather than men. It is read as a marker for the gaten trees named in the
second inscription. The accompanying phrase—dening alas kakayu gaten
hantiganing pasiran—forbids the taking of gaten wood. Anisa
interprets gaten as teak (jaten in the modern tongue), the two
words close enough to be cousins.
Taken together, the evidence shows a kingdom that understood
something we often treat as modern discovery: a forest is best protected when
its protection is made worth someone’s while. Policy, or superstition dressed
as policy—either way, it held for a time against the fire that can eat a
mountain whole.
The habit outlived Wikramawardhana. Under Hayam Wuruk,
Majapahit continued to refine its methods. In a 2024 study on environmental
management and law under the kingdom, Basuki Wasis notes that Hayam Wuruk
confined hunting to a single tract, the Nandaka Forest; elsewhere the animals
were left in peace. Sacred structures rose in the Surabhana Forest near
Pasuruan, in Pajang, in Rawa Kapulungan, in Locanapura—under Bhre Wengker’s
direction—and in the Saghada Forest under Bhre Singhasari. Hayam Wuruk himself
backed settlements and shrines in the Watsari and Tigawangi Forests, urging
preservation and forbidding certain forest goods as cursed. Belief in the curse
was secondary; the trees stood either way.
When persuasion was not enough, there was law. At its height
the kingdom lived under the Kutara Manawa Dharmasastra. Article 92,
under sahasa (offenses of force), set the penalty for cutting a tree
that was not yours: death if done at night; double replacement if done in
daylight. The same logic applied to even a single plant taken without leave,
and to palawija crops and fruit—the secondary produce that mattered
deeply to the kingdom’s economy. Daylight theft of those raised the fine to
triple.
Six hundred years later the fires still come to that
mountainside every dry season, right on schedule, the way something does when
the old bargain has not quite been kept. Whether anyone there still remembers
what the bargain was is the part the stones do not tell.
Comments
Post a Comment