Listen—every one of us has sat down to a game of cards at
some point in our miserable little lives. Maybe it was in some fleabag boarding
house where the walls were so thin you could hear the couple next door fighting
about money (or worse). Maybe it was at a coffee stall where the java tasted
like battery acid and the guy behind the counter had dead eyes. Or maybe—and
this is the one that’ll get you—it was right there in your own living room,
sitting cross-legged on the carpet with your family, back when you still
thought the world made sense.
The cards slap down on whatever surface you’ve got—plastic
table, scarred oak, the floor itself. The air gets thick with laughter (the
nervous kind, mostly), with whispered strategies that sound like prayers, and
sometimes—oh yes, sometimes—with a tension so sharp you could cut yourself on
it.
But here’s the thing, friends and neighbors: How often do
you actually look at those cards? I mean really look at them the way you’d
look at something that might bite you if you turned your back?
Have you ever wondered why the King of Spades has that
thousand-yard stare, like a man who’s seen things no monarch should have to
see? Or why the Queen of Hearts clutches that flower like it’s the last
beautiful thing left in a world gone to hell? And the Jack—ah, the Jack—that
poor bastard caught in the middle of everything, always stuck between the high
and the low, never quite belonging anywhere.
There’s a story here. A dark story. And like all the
best dark stories, it starts a long, long time ago.
The Ancient Fear (China, 9th Century)
The earliest traces—and isn’t that a hell of a phrase, “earliest
traces,” like we’re talking about evidence at a crime scene?—can be found in
China, circa the 9th century, during the Tang Dynasty. Two inventions made it
possible: paper and woodblock printing. Without these, the standardized deck of
cards you’ve got sitting in your kitchen drawer right now would never have
existed. Think about that. Some Chinese guy figures out how to print on paper,
and thirteen centuries later, your Uncle Frank is losing his shirt at poker
every Friday night.
Playing cards came from the same technology that gave us
books and paper money. The oldest written record shows up in something called A
Collection of Miscellanea at Duyang (868 CE), which mentions Princess
Tongchang—daughter of Emperor Yizong—playing a “leaf game” with members of the
Wei clan.
Leaf game. Even the name sounds like something
whispered in the dark.
Historians still argue about what “leaf” really meant. Some
pencil-pusher named Ouyang Xiu from the Song Dynasty thought it referred to
book pages used in dice games. Not cards at all. But here’s what matters:
printed paper was starting to be used for entertainment. For the first
time in human history, people were using technology not just to record the
truth or keep track of money, but to play. To gamble. To lose things.
An anthropologist named William Henry Wilkinson—and doesn’t
that sound like a Stephen King character if ever there was one?—suggested that
the first playing cards might have been money itself. Real money, used
in games. But over time, because people got robbed or went broke or just got
smart, they replaced real money with symbolic “money cards.” Four
denominations: coins, strings of coins, tens of thousands, hundreds of
thousands.
The ancestors of the four suits that’ll fleece you at
blackjack today.
The Journey West (The Silk Road to Egypt)
From China, the cards traveled along the Silk Road like a
virus looking for new hosts. First Persia, then the Islamic world. The
strongest evidence shows up in the Mamluk cards of Egypt, somewhere between the
12th and 16th centuries.
The Mamluk deck had four suits: polo sticks (because rich
people have always had their games), coins (because money is always part
of the game), swords (because violence is never far away), and cups (because
after all that, you need a drink). Each suit had thirteen cards—numbers one
through ten, plus three court cards. King, viceroy, second viceroy.
Here’s where it gets interesting in that way that makes the
hair stand up on the back of your neck: Because Islamic art didn’t do human
figures—something about graven images and all that—the Mamluk cards had no
faces. Just calligraphy. Just words. Rank was indicated through geometry
and beautiful, flowing script.
But the words themselves? Christ, the words:
“With the sword of happiness I shall redeem my beloved who
will later take my life.”
“See how splendid my game is and how beautiful my garments
are.”
These weren’t just cards, friends. These were prophecies.
Warnings. Little paper gravestones marking where happiness goes to die.
This faceless tradition—this aniconic approach—set
the stage for what would happen when the cards finally reached Europe. Because
when European artists got their hands on that solid but characterless
framework, they did what Europeans always do: they put their own faces on it.
Kings, knights, servants. Themselves, staring back from the deck like
reflections in a funhouse mirror.
The European Infection (Late 14th Century)
Playing cards hit Europe sometime in the late 14th century
and spread like wildfire. Like plague. Like stories.
The first European reference comes from Catalonia in 1371—a
Catalan rhyming dictionary that included the word naip. Trevor Denning,
in his 1996 book about Spanish playing cards (and yes, there are people who
write entire books about this stuff, God love them), said the word meant
nothing but “playing card” in Catalan. No other meaning. Just that.
Think about that. A word that means nothing but itself. A
thing that is only what it is.
Nobody knows the exact route the cards took into
Europe—maybe through trade with the Mamluk world, maybe brought back by
Crusaders with haunted eyes and blood on their hands. But they were portable,
flexible, perfect for social entertainment in a world where entertainment was
scarce and life was cheap.
By 1377, Florence had already banned them. “A certain
game called nabbie,” the decree said, “newly introduced in this area.”
That same year in Paris, they forbade card games among the working class.
Why? Because the poor were playing instead of working.
Because cards were dangerous.
Because they always have been.
The French Mutation (Circa 1480)
Italy and Spain kept suits close to the Mamluk system:
swords, cups, coins, clubs. Germany went rural: hearts, bells, leaves, acorns.
Their court cards were all men—könig, obermann, untermann.
No queen. No feminine energy to soften the blow.
But France? France around 1480 did something different.
Something that would change everything.
French cardmakers created the suits we know today: hearts,
spades, diamonds, clubs. And here’s the kicker—each one represented a pillar of
medieval society. The cup became the heart (clergy). The sword became the spade
(military). The coin became the diamond (merchants). The polo stick—which made
no sense in Europe—became the club (farmers).
Four colors instead of four suits. Two colors: red and
black. Good and evil. Blood and death. Love and the grave.
The design was brilliant because it was simple. Bold
shapes, easy to recognize, cheap to print, easy to read even when you’re three
sheets to the wind and betting money you don’t have.
The court hierarchy became king, queen, and jack—the knight
replaced by the queen, giving the deck a distinctly royal flavor. Very French.
Very civilized.
Very false.
Stencil printing let them produce decks a hundred times
faster than the old woodcut method. Gutenberg’s printing press in 1440 made
things even faster, even cheaper. French decks were exported everywhere—through
trade, through colonization, through conquest.
They became the standard. The only standard.
The Gallery of the Damned (16th Century France)
By the 16th century, France had turned playing cards into
something approaching art. Cardmakers started associating the twelve court
cards with historical, mythological, and biblical figures. The portrait
officiel, they called it.
Portable galleries of heroes.
Portable galleries of the dead.
Each king represented a great epoch. King David of Spades
(Israel). Alexander the Great of Clubs (Greece). Charlemagne of Hearts
(France). Julius Caesar of Diamonds (Rome). Four empires. Four men who’d killed
their way to glory.
The queens were equally loaded with meaning: Pallas Athena
of Spades, goddess of war and wisdom—and note this, because it matters—the only
one with a weapon. Judith of Hearts, who cut off a general’s head to
save her people (and doesn’t that sound like a Stephen King novel waiting to
happen?). Rachel of Diamonds, the matriarch. Argine of Clubs, a mystery figure,
possibly an anagram of Regina—Latin for queen—possibly meaning nothing
at all.
The Jacks were knights and heroes. Ogier the Dane of Spades,
a legendary paladin. La Hire of Hearts, who fought with Joan of Arc (and we all
know how that story ended). Hector of Diamonds, the doomed hero of Troy.
Lancelot of Clubs, the noble knight whose love destroyed everything he touched.
According to the International Playing-Card Society—and yes,
that’s a real thing—modern English decks never officially carried these names.
They’re symbolic. Not literal.
But symbols have power, don’t they? Symbols can cut.
The Wild Card (19th Century America)
Then came the Joker. An American invention, because of
course it was. Originally a trump card in a game called Euchre, the
Joker stood outside the suits and ranks. Outside the rules entirely.
It symbolized freedom, individuality, chaos.
The Joker is the card that doesn’t belong. The outsider. The
one who breaks all the rules and grins while doing it.
The Joker is the story we tell ourselves when we’re
losing—that maybe, just maybe, there’s still a way to win.
But here’s what they don’t tell you, friends and neighbors:
The Joker never saves anyone. The Joker just shuffles the deck and deals again.
And the game?
The game goes on forever.
The game always goes on.
Comments
Post a Comment