Dark Shadows of the South Korean Involvement in the Vietnam War: Unraveling the Truth and Pursuit of Justice


The South Korean military’s participation in the Vietnam War as part of the U.S.-led coalition has long been a subject of controversy, with allegations of atrocities committed against civilians, including massacres, torture, and rape. While human rights organizations and historians have extensively documented these claims, the South Korean government vehemently denies them. The involvement of South Korean forces was driven by a commitment to strengthen their alliance with the United States for long-term economic and military assistance. This article explores the dark shadows cast by the South Korean forces during the Vietnam War, shedding light on the alleged atrocities and the recent legal developments surrounding them.

South Korea, under President Park Chung Hee’s leadership, joined the U.S.-led coalition in support of South Vietnam against the communist forces of North Vietnam. The commitment to the alliance aimed to secure economic and military aid from the United States. This was crucial, given the internal turmoil in South Korea during the 1960s. The decision to send troops to Vietnam also served as a gesture of gratitude for U.S. support during the Korean War, with the U.S. agreeing to pay South Korean forces around 5 billion dollars in salaries and other assistance from 1965 to 1973.

In 1965, South Korea deployed the White Horse Division, comprising approximately 50,000 soldiers, making it the second-largest foreign contingent in the Vietnam War after the United States. Over time, President Park Chung Hee increased the total number of South Korean troops sent to Vietnam to 320,000. Among the numerous incidents, the Binh Tai Massacre in 1966 and the Ha My Massacre were particularly brutal, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of unarmed civilians.

Investigating the alleged atrocities committed by South Korean forces posed significant challenges due to the guerrilla nature of the Vietnam War. The difficulty in distinguishing between enemy soldiers and civilians, combined with the lack of precise information on casualties and combatants, led to imprecise reports on the widespread atrocities. Despite these challenges, well-documented cases of massacres in central highland regions and coastal provinces shed light on the various forms of brutality, including shootings, torture, rape, and other physical violence against unarmed civilians.

Historians such as Ku Su Jeong played a crucial role in uncovering the truth about the South Korean military’s actions during the Vietnam War. Ku Su Jeong’s dedication to researching the war extended beyond academic studies. In the 1990s, she received vital documents from the Vietnamese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, forming the basis for her doctoral research. Ku Su Jeong later conducted direct investigations by visiting Vietnamese villages and interviewing war survivors, contributing significantly to public understanding of the war’s impact on Vietnamese civilians.

In a landmark decision on February 8, 2023, a South Korean court ruled in favor of Nguyen Thi Thanh, a survivor of the Phong Nhi Village massacre, rejecting the government’s arguments regarding discrepancies in data related to South Korean forces’ role in the massacre. This decision marked the first time a South Korean court held the government accountable for the mass killing of Vietnamese civilians during the war. Despite this legal victory, no South Korean president has officially acknowledged the massacres committed by their forces in Vietnam.

The involvement of South Korean forces in the Vietnam War left a dark legacy of alleged atrocities against civilians. Recent legal developments, such as the court ruling in favor of Nguyen Thi Thanh, provide a glimmer of hope for accountability and justice. However, the full acknowledgment of historical wrongs and the atrocities committed during the Vietnam War by South Korean forces remains an elusive goal, with the wounds of the past still haunting the collective memory of both nations.

Comments